<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://akgeeks.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>search</title>
 <link>http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/141</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Can Cuil give Google a run for their money?</title>
 <link>http://akgeeks.net/CanCuilgiveGoogleruntheirmoney</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/28/cuil-the-latest-baddest-a_n_115284.html&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Cuil: The Latest, Baddest AntiGoogle Looks Like A Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SAN FRANCISCO — Anna Patterson&#039;s last Internet search engine was so impressive that industry leader Google Inc. bought the technology in 2004 to upgrade its own system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She believes her latest invention is even more valuable _ only this time it&#039;s not for sale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patterson instead intends to upstage Google, which she quit in 2006 to develop a more comprehensive and efficient way to scour the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The end result is Cuil, pronounced &quot;cool.&quot; Backed by $33 million in venture capital, the search engine plans to begin processing requests for the first time Monday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cuil had kept a low profile while Patterson, her husband, Tom Costello, and two other former Google engineers _ Russell Power and Louis Monier _ searched for better ways to search.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, it&#039;s boasting time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://akgeeks.net/CanCuilgiveGoogleruntheirmoney&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://akgeeks.net/CanCuilgiveGoogleruntheirmoney#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/tags/cuil">cuil</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/118">google</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/141">search</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:59:18 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>budque</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">199 at http://akgeeks.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good-bye, Google Bomb</title>
 <link>http://akgeeks.net/GoodbyeGoogleBomb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/31403/thumbs/s-GOOGLE-BOMB-large.jpg border=0&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/23/goodbye_google_bomb.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post, July 23, 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bloggers, take note: the old-school Google bomb is no more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s right, the online behemoth best known for its search engine says that it has rejiggered its legendary and proprietary technology so that online efforts by bloggers to manipulate its top-secret search algorithm to create cheeky, offensive and decidedly off-message answers to searches will no longer work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;It was fun&quot; while it lasted, said Rick Klau, a member of the Google strategic partner development content acquisition team, at a search engine optimization training session for political bloggers in Washington, D.C., this afternoon. But, he said, &quot;Google bombs don&#039;t work anymore.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://akgeeks.net/GoodbyeGoogleBomb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://akgeeks.net/GoodbyeGoogleBomb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/118">google</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/141">search</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:02:15 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>budque</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">197 at http://akgeeks.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flash get Searchable</title>
 <link>http://akgeeks.net/FlashgetSearchable</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like forever my chief complaint against Flash (aside from when it&#039;s used in an all-fashion no-function way) has been that it&#039;s invisible to search engines. But now, apparently, Adobe is giving Google and Yahoo the keys to indexing SWF files. Why they&#039;re not opening it up so any search engine can do it I&#039;m not sure: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/01/1220232&amp;amp;from=rss&quot; title=&quot;http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/01/1220232&amp;amp;from=rss&quot;&gt;http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/01/1220232&amp;amp;from=rss&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://akgeeks.net/FlashgetSearchable#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/tags/flash">flash</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/141">search</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:59:28 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">192 at http://akgeeks.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Open Source Search</title>
 <link>http://akgeeks.net/node/116</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The founder of Wikipedia wants to throw his weight behind open source search tools. &quot;His bet: like Linux became a migraine for the monopolist of the last generation, open source search tools will keep companies like Google&lt;br /&gt;
honest.&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2007/07/30/google-vs-jimmy-wales-and-open-source-search/&quot;&gt; - Google vs Jimmy Wales &amp;amp; Open Source Search.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://akgeeks.net/node/116&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://akgeeks.net/node/116#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/118">google</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/146">open</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/141">search</category>
 <category domain="http://akgeeks.net/taxonomy/term/147">source</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:29:46 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">116 at http://akgeeks.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
